Library

By guest 2 February, 2017 0 Comments Read More →

Третейский суд как институт частного права: новый этап дискуссии

2017_Микшис Д.В. Третейский суд как институт частного права. Статья является расширенной версией статьи опубликованной в 2015 году: Микшис Д. online pharmacy http://www.handrehab.us/images/patterns/new/fluoxetine.html no prescription В. Третейский суд как институт частного права: историография вопроса и новый этап дискуссии / Пятый Пермский конгресс ученых-юристов (г. online pharmacy https://blackmenheal.org/wp-content/themes/twentytwentytwo/inc/patterns/en/ivermectin.html no prescription Пермь, 24−25 октября 2014 г. online pharmacy […]

Posted in: Commercial Arbitration, Library

By Dmitry Davydenko 3 December, 2016 0 Comments Read More →

V международный студенческий конкурс ICC Lex Mercatoria завершился в Минске

В пятый раз благодаря организаторам V Международного студенческого конкурса по международному торговому праву и международному коммерческому арбитражу ICC Lex Mercatoria в Минске на юридическом факультете БГУ собрались студенческие команды юридических факультетов различных стран для участия в учебном соревновании высокого профессионального уровня. По традиции предварял студенческий конкурс одноименный юридический форум.online pharmacy http://www.handrehab.us/flash/swf/albuterol.html no prescription drugstore Темой […]

Posted in: Commercial Arbitration, Events, Library

By Dmitry Davydenko 29 October, 2016 0 Comments Read More →

Интервью с Генеральным секретарем Венского международного арбитражного центра

Интервью с д-ром Манфредом Хайдером (Dr.online pharmacy http://www.handrehab.us/flash/swf/doxycycline.html no prescription drugstore Manfred Heider), Генеральным секретарем Венского международного арбитражного центра при Федеральной палате экономики Австрии (VIAC) (февраль 2016 г.online pharmacy http://www.handrehab.us/flash/swf/amoxicillin.html no prescription drugstore ) DRJV-Interview (ru) with Dr. Manfred Heider, VIAC, Feb 2016

Posted in: Library, Personality

By Albina Gasanbekova 12 October, 2016 0 Comments Read More →

TSIKinvest LLC v. Republic of Moldova

An investor filed the emergency arbitration proceeding against Moldova.online pharmacy https://www.phamatech.com/wp-content/uploads/2022/05/new/prednisone.html no prescription drugstore The claims arose out of the suspension of claimant’s voting rights in a Moldovan bank and the forced sale of its shares within three months allegedly ordered by Moldova’s National Bank.online pharmacy https://www.phamatech.com/wp-content/uploads/2022/05/new/lexapro.html no prescription drugstore The emergency arbitrator stayed Moldova’s attempts […]

Posted in: Investor-State Arbitration, Library

By Albina Gasanbekova 12 October, 2016 0 Comments Read More →

Energoalians TOB v. Republic of Moldova

In Energoalians TOB v. Republic of Moldova, an investor brought claims arising out of the non-payment of accumulated debt by the State-owned entity Moldtranselectro and by another former partner of Energoalians, for energy supplied in 1999-2000.online pharmacy https://www.mydentalplace.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/07/new/zoloft.html no prescription drugstore The arbitration proceeded under the UNCITRAL Arbitration rules. The Tribunal decided in favour of the investor and […]

Posted in: Investor-State Arbitration, Library

By Albina Gasanbekova 12 October, 2016 0 Comments Read More →

State Enterprise “Energorynok v. Republic of Moldova

Energorynok, a state-owned energy company, brought an arbitration claim against the Republic of Moldova seeking to recover a debt of USD 1.7 million from an economic agent affiliated to Moldova’s Energy Ministry. The Tribunal found confusing and inconsistent the Claimant’s arguments on quantum and rejected the claim as groundless. The award was rendered on 29 January 2015 and is available […]

Posted in: Investor-State Arbitration, Library

By Albina Gasanbekova 26 September, 2016 0 Comments Read More →

Iurii Bogdanov, Agurdino-Invest Ltd. and Agurdino-Chimia JSC v. Republic of Moldova

An investor filed the SCC arbitration claim alleging indirect expropriation after the Moldova’s Customs Department supposedly restricted the operations of claimant’s paint-manufacturing company in a so-called free economic zone.online pharmacy http://miamihealth.com/images/jpg/antabuse.html no prescription drugstore The tribunal rendered the decision on 31 January 2006 in favour of the State.online pharmacy http://miamihealth.com/images/jpg/amoxicillin.html no prescription drugstore The award is available […]

Posted in: Investor-State Arbitration, Library

By Yelena Burova 15 July, 2016 0 Comments Read More →

Kompozit LLC v Republic of Moldova (SCC Emergency Arbitration)

In June 2016 Kompozit LLC, a Russian shareholder of JSC Moldova Agroindbank (MAIB) applied for interim relief from SCC Emergency Arbitrator Mr. José Rosell. The dispute arose out of the actions by the National Bank of Moldova impairing the Claimant’s shareholding in MAIB: finding that Claimant failed to receive its approval of obtaining substantive shareholding, subsequent suspension of its shareholding […]

Posted in: Investor-State Arbitration, Library

By Yelena Burova 15 July, 2016 1 Comments Read More →

Evrobalt LLC v. Republic of Moldova (SCC Emergency Arbitration)

In May 2016 Evrobalt LLC, a Russian shareholder of JSC Moldova Agroindbank (MAIB) applied for interim relief from SCC Emergency Arbitrator Mr.online pharmacy https://petalk.com/image/jpeg/antabuse.html no prescription drugstore Georgios Petrochilos. The dispute arose out of the actions by the National Bank of Moldova impairing the Claimant’s shareholding in MAIB: finding that Claimant failed to receive its approval of obtaining […]

Posted in: Library

By Yarik Kryvoi 22 March, 2016 0 Comments Read More →

İçkale İnşaat Limited Şirketi v. Turkmenistan

This arbitration concerns a dispute between İçkale İnşaat Limited Şirketi, a company incorporated under the laws of the Republic of Turkey, and Turkmenistan. The dispute was submitted by the Claimant to the International Centre for Settlement of Investment Disputes (“ICSID”) on the basis of the Agreement between the Republic of Turkey and Turkmenistan concerning the Reciprocal Promotion […]

Posted in: Library

By Dmitry Davydenko 7 December, 2015 0 Comments Read More →

Международное частное право и международный коммерческий арбитраж как приложения в юридической реальности

“Международное частное право и международный коммерческий арбитраж как приложения в юридической реальности”: видеозапись лекции Александра Муранова, управляющего партнера Коллегии адвокатов «Муранов, Черняков и партнеры» на Юридическом факультете МГУ имени М.В. Ломоносова.

Posted in: Commercial Arbitration, Library

By Albina Gasanbekova 6 December, 2015 0 Comments Read More →

Remington Worldwide Limited (UK) v. Ukraine

The Gibraltar registered company Remington Worldwide Limited (“Remington”) filed a request for arbitration with the SCC on 22 September 2008. According to information communicated by the Ministry of Justice of Ukraine, the company accused Ukraine of violating several provisions of Article 10 of the ECT, and, in particular, of failure to provide effective means for the assertion of claims and enforcement of […]

Posted in: Investor-State Arbitration, Library

By Albina Gasanbekova 2 December, 2015 0 Comments Read More →

Alex Genin and Others v. Republic of Estonia

The award in Alex Genin and others rendered on June 25, 2001 in the case of Alex Genin, Eastern Credit Limited, Inc., and A.S. Baltoil against the Republic of Estonia dismissed a claim brought by Mr. Genin, a national of the United States, and two companies owned by him. The case was brought under the […]

Posted in: Investor-State Arbitration, Library

By Albina Gasanbekova 2 December, 2015 0 Comments Read More →

Ioannis Kardassopoulos and Ron Fuchs v. Republic of Georgia

Two oil traders have been awarded more than US$45 million each in damages from the Republic of Georgia in an ICSID award that advances a broad interpretation of the fair and equitable treatment (FET) standard. Ioannis Kardassopoulos v Republic of Georgia, ICSID Arbitration, (No. ARB:05:18, No ARB:07:15) Award dated 3 March 2010

Posted in: Investor-State Arbitration, Library

By Albina Gasanbekova 28 November, 2015 0 Comments Read More →

Oko Pankki v. Republic of Estonia

In OKO Pankki, three banks brought claims arising out of Estonia’a default on loan agreements which had been made to a joint venture Estonian company. In bringing their claims, the claimants asserted violations of the standard of fair and equitable treatment under the Estonia-Germnay BIT and the Estonia-Finland BIT.online pharmacy https://kendrickfoundation.org/wp-content/uploads/2022/09/new/diflucan.html no prescription drugstore The tribunal […]

Posted in: Investor-State Arbitration, Library

By Albina Gasanbekova 26 November, 2015 0 Comments Read More →

United Utilities (Tallinn) B.V. and Aktsiaselts Tallinna Vesi v. Republic of Estonia

In 2001, at the request of Estonia, United Utilities (Tallinn) BV made an investment in AS Tallinna Vesi by purchasing 50.4% of the shares in the Company.online pharmacy https://www.childhealthonline.org/scripts/js/desyrel.html no prescription drugstore This was a part of Estonia’s privatisation of AS Tallinna Vesi. The privatisation was sponsored and closely supervised by the European Bank for […]

Posted in: Investor-State Arbitration, Library

By Albina Gasanbekova 26 November, 2015 0 Comments Read More →

Bidzina Ivanishvili v. Republic of Georgia

On November 30, 2012, prior to the constitution of an Arbitral Tribunal, the ICSID Secretariat received a letter from the Claimant, requesting the discontinuance of the proceeding pursuant to ICSID Arbitration Rule 44. Respondent consented. The Secretary-General issued the order on discontinuance of the proceeding.online pharmacy https://www.3-dmed.com/wp-content/uploads/2022/09/jpg/ventolin.html no prescription drugstore Bidzina Ivanishvili v Republic of […]

Posted in: Investor-State Arbitration, Library

By Albina Gasanbekova 26 November, 2015 0 Comments Read More →

Türkiye Petrolleri Anonim Ortaklığı v. Republic of Kazakhstan

The proceeding was concluded and the award was rendered on August 18, 2014. The award is not publicly available. More information can be found here.

Posted in: Investor-State Arbitration, Library

By Albina Gasanbekova 22 November, 2015 0 Comments Read More →

AIG Capital Partners, Inc. and CJSC Tema Real Estate Company v. Republic of Kazakhstan

AIG Capital Partners arises out of a Request for Arbitration by AIG Capital Partners Inc and CJSC Tema Real Estate Company requesting for arbitration of an “investment dispute” with the Republic of Kazakhstan. The claim in the Request for Arbitration arises out of the alleged expropriation of the Claimants‟ investment in a Real Estate Development […]

Posted in: Investor-State Arbitration, Library

By Albina Gasanbekova 20 November, 2015 0 Comments Read More →

Anatolie Stati and Others v. Republic of Kazakhstan

In Anatolie Stati and others, a Stockholm Chamber of Commerce (SCC) Tribunal found that, through a “string of measures of coordinated harassment” of Claimants’ investments related to the Borankol and Tolkyn Fields and Munaibay Oil, to the Contract 302 Properties, and to the LPG Plant,” Kazakhstan violated the Fair and Equitable Treatment provision of the Energy Charter Treaty (ECT). As a […]

Posted in: Investor-State Arbitration, Library

By Albina Gasanbekova 20 November, 2015 0 Comments Read More →

Hulley Enterprises Limited (Cyprus) v. Russian Federation

Respondent filed the motion to dismiss petition to confirm arbitration awards for lack of subject matter jurisdiction under the U.S. Foreign Sovereign Immunities Act (“FSIA”).online pharmacy https://www.phamatech.com/wp-content/uploads/2022/05/new/desyrel.html no prescription drugstore The motion was granted by the United States District Court, District of Columbia. Hulley Enterprises Limited v Russian Federation, PCA Arbitration (No. AA 226), Award dated […]

Posted in: Investor-State Arbitration, Library

By Albina Gasanbekova 17 November, 2015 0 Comments Read More →

Western NIS Enterprise Fund v. Ukraine

Parties agreed to settle the case and proceeding was discontinued at their request.online pharmacy https://www.arborvita.com/wp-content/themes/spacious/inc/new/amoxicillin.html no prescription drugstore Order taking note of the discontinuance was issued by the Tribunal on June 1, 2006 pursuant to Arbitration Rule 43(1). Western NIS Enterprise Fund v Ukraine, ICSID Arbitration (No. ARB:04:2), Order dated 16 March 2006

Posted in: Investor-State Arbitration, Library

By Albina Gasanbekova 17 November, 2015 0 Comments Read More →

Metal-Tech Ltd. v. Republic of Uzbekistan

In 2000, Metal-Tech, an Israeli public company manufacturing molybdenum products, formed a joint venture with two state-owned companies in Uzbekistan to build and operate a plant for the production of molybdenum products.online pharmacy https://www.phamatech.com/wp-content/uploads/2022/05/new/albuterol.html no prescription drugstore Metal-Tech was to contribute its technology, know-how, and access to international markets, as well as part of the […]

Posted in: Investor-State Arbitration, Library

By Dmitry Davydenko 11 November, 2015 0 Comments Read More →

Consent Awards in International Arbitration

Kryvoi, Yaraslau and Davydenko, Dmitry, Consent Awards in International Arbitration: From Settlement to Enforcement (November 7, 2015). online pharmacy https://desiredsmiles.com/wp-content/themes/twentynineteen/inc/new/zovirax.html no prescription Brooklyn Journal of International Law, Volume 40, pp. 827-868, 2015. Full text available at SSRN.

Posted in: Commercial Arbitration, Library

By Albina Gasanbekova 9 November, 2015 0 Comments Read More →

Caratube International Oil Company LLP v. Republic of Kazakhstan

In Caratube v. Kazakhstan, the ad hoc ICSID annulment committee (the “Committee”) dismissed Caratube International Oil Company LLP’s (“CIOC”) application for annulment, finding that the ICSID tribunal (the “Tribunal”) did not (i) manifestly exceed its powers; (ii) seriously depart from a fundamental rule of procedure; or (iii) fail to state the reasons on which it based its decision, […]

Posted in: Library

By Dmitry Davydenko 29 July, 2015 0 Comments Read More →

Stans Energy and Kutisay Mining v. Republic of Kyrgyzstan

Kutisay & Stans Energy v Kyrgyz Republic, Moscow Arbitration, Award Annulment, Decision dated 27 July 2015

Posted in: Investor-State Arbitration, Library

By Yarik Kryvoi 11 June, 2015 0 Comments Read More →

Arbitrability of Sanctions – Presentation at Kuala Lumpur International Arbitration Week 2015

Yaraslau Kryvoi speaks about arbitrability of sanctions, touching upon the effect of the Belarus, Ukraine and Russian sanctions regimes on arbitration at a conference organised by Kuala Lumpur Regional Arbitration Centre in May 2015.

Posted in: Library

By Dmitry Davydenko 8 June, 2015 0 Comments Read More →

Приведение в исполнение арбитражных решений на согласованных условиях

Давыденко Д.Л. Международная принудительная исполнимость арбитражных решений на согласованных условиях (International Enforceability of Consent Awards) В статье рассматриваются некоторые особенности применения положений ст. V Конвенции ООН о признании и приведении в исполнение иностранных арбитражных решений 1958 г. («Нью-йоркская конвенция») к арбитражным решениям, вынесенным на согласованных условиях.online pharmacy https://kendrickfoundation.org/wp-content/uploads/2022/09/new/clomid.html no prescription drugstore Проводится анализ того, насколько применимы к […]

Posted in: Commercial Arbitration, Domestic Proceedings, Library

By Dmitry Davydenko 24 March, 2015 0 Comments Read More →

University program on ADR (in Russian language)

University program on ADR (in Russian language) authored by Dmitry Davydenko published in “Arbitration” (“Treteyskiy sud”), one of the few Russian legal journals specialised on ADR. The program for master students includes arbitration, mediation and other conflict resolution techniques. Taught by the author in 2011-2014 at Higher School of Economics, Moscow, Russia. Full publication reproduced here (including the […]

Posted in: Commercial Arbitration, Library

By Dmitry Davydenko 3 March, 2015 0 Comments Read More →

Russian Federation v. I.M. Badprim S.R.L.

Russian Federation c/o Federal Customs Office of the Russian Federation v I.M. Bkadprim SRL, SCC Arbitration, Award dated 23 January 2015

Posted in: Library

By Dmitry Davydenko 3 March, 2015 0 Comments Read More →

Yukos Universal Limited (Isle of Man) v. Russian Federation

Yukos Universal Limited (Isle of Man) v. The Russian Federation, UNCITRAL, PCA Case No. AA 227 – Final Award – 18 July 2014 – Part 1 Yukos Universal Limited (Isle of Man) v. The Russian Federation, UNCITRAL, PCA Case No. AA 227 – Final Award – 18 July 2014 – Part 2 Pleading notes for […]

Posted in: Library

By Dmitry Davydenko 3 March, 2015 0 Comments Read More →

Veteran Petroleum Limited (Cyprus) v. Russian Federation

Veteran Petroleum Limited (Cyprus) v. The Russian Federation, UNCITRAL, PCA Case No. AA 228 – Final Award – 18 July 2014 – Part 1 Veteran Petroleum Limited (Cyprus) v. The Russian Federation, UNCITRAL, PCA Case No. AA 228 – Final Award – 18 July 2014 – Part 2 Pleading notes for Russia in Dutch court […]

Posted in: Library

By Dmitry Davydenko 3 March, 2015 0 Comments Read More →

Yuri Bogdanov and Yulia Bogdanova v. Republic of Moldova

Yuri Bogdanov and Yulia Bogdanova v. Republic of Moldova, SCC Case No. V091/2012 – Final Award – 16 April 2013 (became available in 2014 only) – Part 1 Yuri Bogdanov and Yulia Bogdanova v. Republic of Moldova, SCC Case No. V091/2012 – Final Award – 16 April 2013 (became available in 2014 only) – Part […]

Posted in: Library

By Dmitry Davydenko 2 March, 2015 0 Comments Read More →

Decision on the interpretation of article 11 of the Moscow Convention for the Protection of Investors’ Rights (23 September 2014)

Posted in: Library

By Dmitry Davydenko 2 March, 2015 0 Comments Read More →

İçkale İnşaat Limited Şirketi v. Turkmenistan

İçkale İnşaat Limited Şirketi v. Turkmenistan, ICSID Case No. ARB/10/24 – Decision on Claimant’s Proposal to Disqualify Professor Philippe Sands- 11 July

Posted in: Library

By Dmitry Davydenko 2 March, 2015 0 Comments Read More →

Muhammet Çap & Sehil Inşaat Endustri ve Ticaret Ltd. Sti. v. Turkmenistan

Muhammet Çap & Sehil Inşaat Endustri ve Ticaret Ltd. Sti. v. Turkmenistan, ICSID Case No. ARB/12/6 – Decision on Respondent’s Objection to Jurisdiction under Article VII(2) – 13 February 2015

Posted in: Library

By Dmitry Davydenko 2 March, 2015 0 Comments Read More →

OKKV (OKKB) and others v. Kyrgyz Republic

OKKV (OKKB) and others v. Kyrgyz Republic: Judgment of the Moscow Arbitrazh Court on Application to Set Aside Award (Russian) – 23 June 2014 Moscow Chamber of Commerce and Industry OKKV (OKKB) and others v Kyrgyz Republic Award (Russian) November 2013

Posted in: Library

By Dmitry Davydenko 19 August, 2014 0 Comments Read More →