Tag: SCC arbitration

Форум по разрешению споров в странах Восточной Европы собрал в Минске более 200 участников из 20 стран мира

Форум по разрешению споров в странах Восточной Европы собрал в Минске более 200 участников из 20 стран мира

В Минске во второй раз состоялся Форум по разрешению споров в странах Восточной Европы (EEDRF). Международный формат мероприятия на несколько дней объединил юристов 20 стран мира для обсуждения ключевых тем, касающихся рассмотрения споров в международном коммерческом арбитраже и государственных судах, под слоганом «Докажи это, если сможешь». Более 200 участников и гостей, в том числе юристы […]

By 26 September, 2017 0 Comments Read More →
Форум по разрешению споров в странах Восточной Европы превратится в целый «Арбитражный weekend»

Форум по разрешению споров в странах Восточной Европы превратится в целый «Арбитражный weekend»

Накануне Форума EEDRF-2017 в Минске состоятся два бесплатных мероприятия-сателлита, которые в первую очередь ориентированы на тех специалистов, которые интересуются вопросами арбитража. 21 сентября 2017 г. организационный партнер Форума по разрешению споров в странах Восточной Европы (EEDRF) адвокатское бюро «Сысуев, Бондарь, Храпуцкий СБХ» приглашает принять участие в двух бесплатных мероприятиях-сателлитах, которые состоятся в Minsk Marriot Hotel […]

By 2 August, 2017 0 Comments Read More →
Sanctity of the contract upheld in Swedish arbitration

Sanctity of the contract upheld in Swedish arbitration

In a recent award rendered under the Rules of the Arbitration Institute of the Stockholm Chamber of Commerce, the Arbitration Panel held that “the wording of the contract must be complied with”, if it “does not include any exceptions”. The Panel also drew a line in determining the basis for calculation of limitation period according […]

By 10 July, 2017 0 Comments Read More →
TSIKinvest LLC v. Republic of Moldova

TSIKinvest LLC v. Republic of Moldova

An investor filed the emergency arbitration proceeding against Moldova. The claims arose out of the suspension of claimant’s voting rights in a Moldovan bank and the forced sale of its shares within three months allegedly ordered by Moldova’s National Bank. The emergency arbitrator stayed Moldova’s attempts to force the claimant to divest its shares in a bank. The […]

Russia losing battles but winning wars with foreign investors: cases overview

Russia losing battles but winning wars with foreign investors: cases overview

More often than not, foreign investors reach some success in arbitration cases against Russia. However, obtaining ultimate remuneration for their efforts usually becomes a long and evasive target, because the award either gets annulled or faces insurmountable enforcement difficulties. Many international treaties of the Russian Federation including those concluded by the USSR as its legal predecessor include a “narrow” […]

Enforceability of Emergency Arbitrator Awards in Ukraine

Enforceability of Emergency Arbitrator Awards in Ukraine

In an earlier post the CIS Arbitration Forum reported on three investment treaty claims which have been initiated this year against Ukraine in the gas sector. In one of them a UK-based energy company, JKX Oil & Gas, and its Dutch and Ukrainian subsidiaries, Poltava Gas B.V. and JV Poltava Petroleum Company, obtained the first ever emergency arbitration award against […]

Yuri Bogdanov and Yulia Bogdanova v. Republic of Moldova

Yuri Bogdanov and Yulia Bogdanova v. Republic of Moldova

Yuri Bogdanov and Yulia Bogdanova v. Republic of Moldova, SCC Case No. V091/2012 – Final Award – 16 April 2013 (became available in 2014 only) – Part 1 Yuri Bogdanov and Yulia Bogdanova v. Republic of Moldova, SCC Case No. V091/2012 – Final Award – 16 April 2013 (became available in 2014 only) – Part […]

Yara International v. Acron

Yara International v. Acron

Yara International ASA v JSC Acron, SCC Arbitration No. V (135:2006), Award dated 17 June 2008

TNK Trade v. Swonko Swedish Oil

TNK Trade v. Swonko Swedish Oil

TNK Trade Ltd. v Swonco Swedish Oil AB, SCC Arbitration (No. 078:2000), Award dated 19 March 2004

Rual Trade v. Viva Trade

Rual Trade v. Viva Trade

Rual Trade Ltd. v Viva Trade LLC and others, SCC Arbitration (No. F 192:2009), Award dated 21 April 2010

Rosukrenergo AG v. Emfetz

Rosukrenergo AG v. Emfetz

Rosukrenergo AG v Emfesz, SCC Arbitration No. V (183:2009), 17 March 2011

Renta 4 et al v. Russian Federation

Renta 4 et al v. Russian Federation

Renta 4 S.V.S.A. v Russian Federation, SCC Arbitration No. V (024:2007), Award of Prelimenary Objections dated 20 March 2009

Amto v. Ukraine

Amto v. Ukraine

AMTO LLC v Ukraine, SCC Arbitration (No. 08:2005), Award dated 26 March 2008

Quasar de Valores SICAV S.A. et al v. Russian Federation

Quasar de Valores SICAV S.A. et al v. Russian Federation

Quasar de Valores SICAN S.A. v the Russian Federation, SCC Arbitration, Award dated 20 July 2012

Petrobart Ltd v. Republic of Kyrgyzstan

Petrobart Ltd v. Republic of Kyrgyzstan

  Petrobart Ltd. v the Kyrgyz Republic, SCC Arbitration (No. 126:2003) Award dated 29 March 2005 Petrobart Ltd. v Kyrgyz Republic, UNCITRAL Arbitration, Award dated 13 February 2003

Mincom Services v. TOO Aktobinskaya

Mincom Services v. TOO Aktobinskaya

Mincom Service Pty Ltd. v TOO Aktubinskaya Mednaya Companiya, SCC Arbitration (No. 102:2010), Award dated 20 September 2010

Mir’s Ltd. v.  JSC Technopromexport

Mir’s Ltd. v. JSC Technopromexport

Mir’s Ltd. v Joint Stock Company Technopromexport, SCC Arbitration No. V (080:2009), Award dated 19 November 2010

Italia-Ukraina-Gas v. Naftogaz of Ukraine

Italia-Ukraina-Gas v. Naftogaz of Ukraine

Italia Ukraina Gas S.p.a v National Joint-Stock Company “Naftogaz of Ukraine”, SCC Arbitration No. V (007:2008), Award dated 19 October 2009

Techsnab Export v. Palmco Corporation

Techsnab Export v. Palmco Corporation

JSC Techsnabexport v Palmco Corporation, SCC Arbitration (No. 010/2006), Award dated 11 June 2007 JSC Techsnabexport v Palmco Corporation, Final Partial Award dated 22 June 2007  

Gazprom v. Republic of Lithuania

Gazprom v. Republic of Lithuania

Gazprom v Republic of Lithuania, SCC Arbitration No. V (125:2011), Award dated 31 July 2012

Investor (unnamed) v. Republic of Kazakhstan

Investor (unnamed) v. Republic of Kazakhstan

Investor vs. Kazakhstan, SCC Arbitration (No. 122/2001), Award dated 2004

Globe Nuclear Services v. TechsnabExport

Globe Nuclear Services v. TechsnabExport

Globe Nuclear Services, Supply GNSS, Ltd. v AO Techsnabexport, SCC Arbitration (No. 156:2003), Award dated 11 June 2007  

Al-Bahloul v. Republic of Tajikistan

Al-Bahloul v. Republic of Tajikistan

Mohammad Ammar Al. Bahloul v. Republic of Tajikistan, SCC ArtliIralion No V (060II200l), Award dated 8 June 2010

Rosinvestco UK Ltd. v. Russian Federation

Rosinvestco UK Ltd. v. Russian Federation

Rosinvestco UK Ltd. vs. the Russian Federation, SCC Arbitration No. V (079/2005), 10.2007 (Award on Jurisdiction)

By 24 February, 2013 0 Comments Read More →
Vladimir Berschader and MoiseBerschader v. Russian Federation

Vladimir Berschader and MoiseBerschader v. Russian Federation

Vladimir Berschader and MoiseBerschader v the Russian Federation, SCC Arbitration (No. 080:2004), Award dated 21 April 2006

By 24 February, 2013 0 Comments Read More →