Tag: enforcement of foreign judgments

UK court enforced Tatneft’s award despite illegality defense
By 26 January, 2021 0 Comments Read More →

UK court enforced Tatneft’s award despite illegality defense

Ukraine has failed to overturn the enforcement of the investment treaty award won by Tatneft despite a finding by the Commercial Court in London (the „Court”) that a significant portion of the damages awarded related to an illegal purchase of shares. The Court found that under Ukrainian corporate law Tatneft illegally obtained the investments, and […]

The New Hague Convention on the Recognition and Enforcement of Foreign Judgments: A New Competition to the New York Convention?
By 22 January, 2020 0 Comments Read More →

The New Hague Convention on the Recognition and Enforcement of Foreign Judgments: A New Competition to the New York Convention?

On 2 July 2019, the delegates of the 22nd Diplomatic Session of the Hague Conference on Private International Law (“Hague Conference”) adopted the Convention on the Recognition and Enforcement of Foreign Judgments in Civil or Commercial Matters (“Convention”). The discussions about potential ratification of the Convention by various countries (including the US and Russia) are […]

Posted in: Uncategorized
CIS Regional Conventions on Cross-Border Litigation and Its Application by Russian Courts
By 9 December, 2016 0 Comments Read More →

CIS Regional Conventions on Cross-Border Litigation and Its Application by Russian Courts

Recognition and enforcement of foreign court judgments in Russia generally require the existence of a treaty between the issuing state and the recognising state; otherwise, the principle of reciprocity applies. On the CIS level this procedure is relatively facilitated by a number of conventions. This post looks at the main features of these CIS regional […]

Hague Convention Rules Mandatory for Service on Russian Parties

Hague Convention Rules Mandatory for Service on Russian Parties

Last Friday the Supreme Commercial Court released its full reasons for the decision in Nortel v UNI. The Court ruled that an English judgment may not be enforced in Russia, because the respondents had not participated in the English proceedings nor had they been served in accordance with the Hague Convention. The decision may result in delays in […]

Service of Foreign Proceedings on Russian Parties: Rules to be Clarified  by the Supreme Commercial Court

Service of Foreign Proceedings on Russian Parties: Rules to be Clarified by the Supreme Commercial Court

Later this year the Presidium of Russia’s Supreme Commercial Court will decide whether service by means other than those under the Hague Convention constitutes proper notice sufficient for enforcement of the resulting judgment of a foreign court. The decision will have significant repercussions for international litigations involving respondents based in Russia, since to date in many […]

Ukraine: New Rules on Security for Claims and Costs
By 11 September, 2012 0 Comments Read More →

Ukraine: New Rules on Security for Claims and Costs

Two weeks ago the Cabinet of Ministers of Ukraine decided to allow state organs to make payments under orders for security for costs or security for the claim issued by foreign courts and arbitral tribunals. The new rules are expected to remove some practical difficulties the Ukrainian authorities currently face in such situations. According to the Ministry […]