Library

Brexit & international arbitration

Brexit & international arbitration

Yarik Kryvoi. British Institute of International and Comparative Law. Brexit & international arbitration.

By 17 November, 2017 0 Comments Read More →
Mediation at the Russian Chamber of Commerce and Industry

Mediation at the Russian Chamber of Commerce and Industry

Mediation at the Russian Chamber of Commerce and Industry Presentation by Dmitry Davydenko. The Russian Chamber of Commerce and Industry comprises a Panel of mediators established in 2006 and actively involved in settlement of commercial disputes, both international and domestic.

Practice review of Maritime Arbitration Commission at the Chamber of Commerce and Industry of the Russian Federation

Practice review of Maritime Arbitration Commission at the Chamber of Commerce and Industry of the Russian Federation

Обзор практики Морской арбитражной комиссии при ТПП РФ по разрешению споров из договоров страхования (2015 – 2016 гг.). Автор: Дарья Ждан-Пушкина. Статья опубликована в журнале “Страховое право” № 3, 2017. Practice review of Maritime Arbitration Commission at the Russian Chamber of Commerce and Industry: disputes arising from insurance contracts (2015-2016). Authored by Darya-Zhdan-Pushkina. In Russian language. […]

By 10 October, 2017 0 Comments Read More →
International arbitration in Russia under the new legislative framework – PowerPoint presentation

International arbitration in Russia under the new legislative framework – PowerPoint presentation

International arbitration in Russia under the new legislative framework Presentation by Dmitry Davydenko at CIS-Roundtable hosted by the Max Planck Institute for Comparative and International Private Law (Hamburg, 5 October 2017).  CIS-Roundtable is a regular discussion forum on the legal, political and societal developments of the post-Soviet region.

By 5 October, 2017 0 Comments Read More →
Bulletin of the Federal Institute of Mediation

Bulletin of the Federal Institute of Mediation

Online journal “Bulletin of the Federal Institute of Mediation” has been published since 2017. The founder is the Russian federal state budgetary institution “The Federal Institute of Mediation”. Its goal is to set high standards of research in the field of mediation in Russia, present works of contemporary Russian and foreign academic scholars in the field […]

By 25 September, 2017 0 Comments Read More →
Судьбы международного частного права и международного коммерческого арбитража в СССР и РФ

Судьбы международного частного права и международного коммерческого арбитража в СССР и РФ

А.И. Муранов. Повороты судеб международного частного права и международного коммерческого арбитража в СССР и РФ через призму изменений Номенклатуры специальностей научных работников и паспортов научных специальностей. Alexander I. Muranov. The twists of fate of private international law and international commercial arbitration in USSR and Russia through the lens of changes in the nomenclature of academics’ specialties and passports of  academic […]

By 13 September, 2017 0 Comments Read More →
Recognition of foreign judgments without enforcement in Russia

Recognition of foreign judgments without enforcement in Russia

  Alexander A. Kostin, Victoria V. Kholodova. Certain issues relating to recognition of foreign judgments on economic disputes, which do not require enforcement under Arbitrazh [Commercial] Procedure Code of Russian Federation. Summary of the Article published in Journal of Russian Law, N 5, 2017.      

By 7 July, 2017 0 Comments Read More →
Сборник in memoriam В.А. Кабатова и С.Н. Лебедева

Сборник in memoriam В.А. Кабатова и С.Н. Лебедева

Представляем электронную версию сборника памяти В.А. Кабатова и С.Н. Лебедева, ушедших в 2016 году. Collection of texts in memoriam of Sergei Lebedev and Vitaliy Kabatov. Segrei Lebedev Department of Civil and Private International Law of MGIMO at the Russian Ministry of Foreign Affairs; Maritime Arbitration Commission at the Russian Chamber of Commerce and Industry; International […]

Рецензия на первый российский учебник по медиации

Рецензия на первый российский учебник по медиации

Представляем рецензию на учебник «Медиация» под ред. А. Д. Карпенко, А. Д. Осиновского. СПб.: Редакция журнала «Третейский суд»; М.: Статут, 2016. Рецензия подготовлена А.А. Чирикал, профессиональным медиатором, юристом, председателем комиссии по применению процедуры медиации на финансововм рынке РФ Ассоциации «Гильдия финансовых аналитиков и риск-менеджеров». Review of first Russian scholarly textbook on mediation written by a group of co-authors […]

By 19 June, 2017 0 Comments Read More →
Проект проф.стандарта «Специалист по администрированию арбитража” / Draft professional standard “Specialist in administration of arbitration”

Проект проф.стандарта «Специалист по администрированию арбитража” / Draft professional standard “Specialist in administration of arbitration”

See English text below Представляем для обсуждения проект профессионального стандарта «Специалист по администрированию арбитража (третейского разбирательства)». Данный стандарт разработан в соответствии с новым законодательством России об арбитраже, которое предусматривает понятие «администрирование арбитража». Проект подготовлен Торгово-промышленной палатой России в рамках деятельности Совета по профессиональным квалификациям ТПП РФ, созданного решением Национального совета при Президенте Российской Федерации по профессиональным […]

Вышел новый выпуск «Вестника международного коммерческого арбитража»

Вышел новый выпуск «Вестника международного коммерческого арбитража»

Выпуск (2 (13) июль – декабрь 2016)  продолжает знакомить  читателей с  глубоким и обстоятельным анализом событий, тенденций и нюансов современной практики МКА в России и зарубежных странах, освещать разнообразные сложные и острые вопросы, связанные с МКА. CIS Arbitration Forum является партнером «Вестника международного коммерческого арбитража». International Commercial Arbitration Review Issue No. 2 for 2016: see […]

By 23 March, 2017 0 Comments Read More →
Agreement on Promotion and Reciprocal Protection of Investments in the Member States of the Eurasian Economic Community

Agreement on Promotion and Reciprocal Protection of Investments in the Member States of the Eurasian Economic Community

The Agreement was signed in Moscow in 2008 and is in force as between the following CIS states: Armenia, Belarus, Kazakhstan, Kyrgyzstan, Russian Federation. Below is the text in Russian. Agreement on Promotion and Reciprocal Protection of Investments in the Member States of the Eurasian Economic Community_Russian Source: Investment Policy Hub

By 17 February, 2017 0 Comments Read More →
Free Trade Agreement between the Eurasian Economic Union and Vietnam

Free Trade Agreement between the Eurasian Economic Union and Vietnam

Free Trade Agreement between the Eurasian Economic Union and its member states, on the one part, and  the Socialist Republic of Vietnam, of the other part, was signed in Kazakhstan in 2015 and entered into force on 5 October 2016. Chapter 8 focuses on investment protection. Below are the texts in Russian and English. Free Trade […]

By 17 February, 2017 0 Comments Read More →
Kiev Convention on Settling Disputes Related to Commercial Activities

Kiev Convention on Settling Disputes Related to Commercial Activities

Kiev Convention on Settling Disputes Related to Commercial Activities was signed in 1992 and is in force as between the following states: Armenia, Azerbaijan, Belarus, Kazakhstan, Kyrgyzstan, Russian Federation, Turkmenistan, Tajikistan, Ukraine, Uzbekistan. It sets out rules for jurisdiction of member states’ courts in transnational disputes and legal cooperation between them, recognition and enforcement of […]

By 3 February, 2017 0 Comments Read More →
Moscow Convention on Protection of the Rights of the Investor

Moscow Convention on Protection of the Rights of the Investor

Moscow Convention on Protection of the Rights of the Investor was signed on 28 March 1997 and is in force as between the following CIS member states: Armenia, Belarus, The Republic of Moldova, Tajikistan, Kazakhstan and Kyrgyzstan. The Convention provides main types of obligations of host states towards foreign investors, eg, fair and equitable treatment, […]

By 3 February, 2017 0 Comments Read More →
Minsk Convention on Legal Assistance and Legal Relations in Civil, Family and Criminal Matters

Minsk Convention on Legal Assistance and Legal Relations in Civil, Family and Criminal Matters

Minsk Convention on Legal Assistance and Legal Relations in Civil, Family and Criminal Matters was signed in 1993 and is in force as between the following states: Armenia, Belarus, Kazakhstan, Kyrgyzstan, Moldova, Russian Federation, Turkmenistan, Tajikistan, Ukraine, Uzbekistan. The Convention provides the rules for legal cooperation between member states’ courts in civil, family and criminal matters. […]

By 3 February, 2017 0 Comments Read More →
Казус самопоручительства и проблема необоснованного “умножения сущностей” должника

Казус самопоручительства и проблема необоснованного “умножения сущностей” должника

Микшис Д.В. Казус самопоручительства и проблема необоснованного умножения сущностей должника. 2017. Публикация подготовлена на основе более ранней статьи, впервые опубликованной в издании: Академический вестник ТГАМЭУП № 4(30) – серия «Право» [Текст]: научно-аналитический журнал. Тюмень: «Тюменская государственная академия мировой экономики, управления и права» («ТГАМЭУП»), 2014. С. 112 – 123. Переработана и дополнена. В данной редакции публикуется впервые. Denis Mikshis. The case of self-suretyship […]

By 2 February, 2017 0 Comments Read More →
Третейский суд как институт частного права: новый этап дискуссии

Третейский суд как институт частного права: новый этап дискуссии

2017_Микшис Д.В. Третейский суд как институт частного права. Статья является расширенной версией статьи опубликованной в 2015 году: Микшис Д.В. Третейский суд как институт частного права: историография вопроса и новый этап дискуссии / Пятый Пермский конгресс ученых-юристов (г. Пермь, 24−25 октября 2014 г.): Избранные материалы / Отв. ред. В. Г. Голубцов, О. А. Кузнецова — М.: […]

By 2 February, 2017 0 Comments Read More →
V международный студенческий конкурс ICC Lex Mercatoria завершился в Минске

V международный студенческий конкурс ICC Lex Mercatoria завершился в Минске

В пятый раз благодаря организаторам V Международного студенческого конкурса по международному торговому праву и международному коммерческому арбитражу ICC Lex Mercatoria в Минске на юридическом факультете БГУ собрались студенческие команды юридических факультетов различных стран для участия в учебном соревновании высокого профессионального уровня. По традиции предварял студенческий конкурс одноименный юридический форум. Темой юридического форума в этом году […]

Интервью с Генеральным секретарем Венского международного арбитражного центра

Интервью с Генеральным секретарем Венского международного арбитражного центра

Интервью с д-ром Манфредом Хайдером (Dr. Manfred Heider), Генеральным секретарем Венского международного арбитражного центра при Федеральной палате экономики Австрии (VIAC) (февраль 2016 г.) DRJV-Interview (ru) with Dr. Manfred Heider, VIAC, Feb 2016

TSIKinvest LLC v. Republic of Moldova

TSIKinvest LLC v. Republic of Moldova

An investor filed the emergency arbitration proceeding against Moldova. The claims arose out of the suspension of claimant’s voting rights in a Moldovan bank and the forced sale of its shares within three months allegedly ordered by Moldova’s National Bank. The emergency arbitrator stayed Moldova’s attempts to force the claimant to divest its shares in a bank. The […]

Energoalians TOB v. Republic of Moldova

Energoalians TOB v. Republic of Moldova

In Energoalians TOB v. Republic of Moldova, an investor brought claims arising out of the non-payment of accumulated debt by the State-owned entity Moldtranselectro and by another former partner of Energoalians, for energy supplied in 1999-2000. The arbitration proceeded under the UNCITRAL Arbitration rules. The Tribunal decided in favour of the investor and the award was rendered on […]

State Enterprise “Energorynok v. Republic of Moldova

State Enterprise “Energorynok v. Republic of Moldova

Energorynok,  a state-owned energy company, brought an arbitration claim against the Republic of Moldova seeking to recover a debt of USD 1.7 million from an economic agent affiliated to Moldova’s Energy Ministry. The Tribunal found confusing and inconsistent the Claimant’s arguments on quantum and rejected the claim as groundless. The award was rendered on 29 January 2015 and is available […]

Iurii Bogdanov, Agurdino-Invest Ltd. and Agurdino-Chimia JSC v. Republic of Moldova

Iurii Bogdanov, Agurdino-Invest Ltd. and Agurdino-Chimia JSC v. Republic of Moldova

An investor filed the SCC arbitration claim alleging indirect expropriation after the Moldova’s Customs Department supposedly restricted the operations of claimant’s paint-manufacturing company in a so-called free economic zone. The tribunal rendered the decision on 31 January 2006 in favour of the State. The award is available here. Bogdanov and Agurdio Invest v.Moldova (SCC 2005)

Kompozit LLC v Republic of Moldova (SCC Emergency Arbitration)

Kompozit LLC v Republic of Moldova (SCC Emergency Arbitration)

In June 2016 Kompozit LLC, a Russian shareholder of JSC Moldova Agroindbank (MAIB)  applied for interim relief from SCC Emergency Arbitrator Mr. José Rosell. The dispute arose out of the actions by the National Bank of Moldova impairing the Claimant’s shareholding in MAIB: finding that Claimant failed to receive its approval of obtaining substantive shareholding, subsequent suspension of its shareholding […]

Evrobalt LLC v. Republic of Moldova (SCC Emergency Arbitration)

Evrobalt LLC v. Republic of Moldova (SCC Emergency Arbitration)

In May 2016 Evrobalt LLC, a Russian shareholder of JSC Moldova Agroindbank (MAIB) applied for interim relief from SCC Emergency Arbitrator Mr. Georgios Petrochilos. The dispute arose out of the actions by the National Bank of Moldova impairing the Claimant’s shareholding in MAIB: finding that Claimant failed to receive its approval of obtaining substantive shareholding, subsequent suspension of its […]

İçkale İnşaat Limited Şirketi v. Turkmenistan

İçkale İnşaat Limited Şirketi v. Turkmenistan

This arbitration concerns a dispute between İçkale İnşaat Limited Şirketi, a company incorporated under the laws of the Republic of Turkey, and Turkmenistan. The dispute was submitted by the Claimant to the International Centre for Settlement of Investment Disputes (“ICSID”) on the basis of the Agreement between the Republic of Turkey and Turkmenistan concerning the Reciprocal Promotion […]

Значение новых законов об арбитраже в России для иностранных арбитражных центров

Значение новых законов об арбитраже в России для иностранных арбитражных центров

Муранов А.И. Значение новых законов об арбитраже в России для иностранных арбитражных центров и иностранных арбитров: вопросы территориального и экстерриториального  действия законов, пределов вводимого ими разрешительного режима, его соответствия праву ВТО. Alexander Muranov. Implications of the new Russian arbitration laws for foreign arbitration centers and foreign arbitrators: issues of territorial and extraterritorial effect of the laws, limits of […]

By 24 January, 2016 0 Comments Read More →
Международное частное право и международный коммерческий арбитраж как приложения в юридической реальности

Международное частное право и международный коммерческий арбитраж как приложения в юридической реальности

“Международное частное право и международный коммерческий арбитраж как приложения в юридической реальности”: видеозапись  лекции Александра Муранова, управляющего партнера Коллегии адвокатов «Муранов, Черняков и партнеры» на Юридическом факультете МГУ имени М.В. Ломоносова. 

Remington Worldwide Limited (UK) v. Ukraine

Remington Worldwide Limited (UK) v. Ukraine

The Gibraltar registered company Remington Worldwide Limited (“Remington”) filed a request for arbitration with the SCC on 22 September 2008. According to information communicated  by the Ministry of Justice of Ukraine, the company accused Ukraine of violating several provisions of Article 10 of the ECT, and, in particular, of failure to provide effective means for the assertion of claims and enforcement of […]

Alex Genin and Others v. Republic of Estonia

Alex Genin and Others v. Republic of Estonia

The award in Alex Genin and others rendered on June 25, 2001 in the case of Alex Genin, Eastern Credit Limited, Inc., and A.S. Baltoil against the Republic of Estonia dismissed a claim brought by Mr. Genin, a national of the United States, and two companies owned by him. The case was brought under the […]

Ioannis Kardassopoulos and Ron Fuchs v. Republic of Georgia

Ioannis Kardassopoulos and Ron Fuchs v. Republic of Georgia

Two oil traders have been awarded more than US$45 million each in damages from the Republic of Georgia in an ICSID award that advances a broad interpretation of the fair and equitable treatment (FET) standard. Ioannis Kardassopoulos v Republic of Georgia, ICSID Arbitration, (No. ARB:05:18, No ARB:07:15) Award dated 3 March 2010

Oko Pankki v. Republic of Estonia

Oko Pankki v. Republic of Estonia

In OKO Pankki, three banks brought claims arising out of Estonia’a default on loan agreements which had been made to a joint venture Estonian company. In bringing their claims, the claimants asserted violations of the standard of fair and equitable treatment under the Estonia-Germnay BIT and the Estonia-Finland BIT. The tribunal rendered the award in favor […]

Видеозапись Всероссийского форума третейского и делового сообществ 8 октября 2015 г.

Видеозапись Всероссийского форума третейского и делового сообществ 8 октября 2015 г.

Видеозапись Третьего Всероссийского форума третейского и делового сообществ «Третейская реформа в России: завершающий этап?», который состоялся в СПбГУ 8 октября 2015 года (3 части):   Часть 1 Часть 2 Часть 3

By 27 November, 2015 0 Comments Read More →
United Utilities (Tallinn) B.V. and Aktsiaselts Tallinna Vesi v. Republic of Estonia

United Utilities (Tallinn) B.V. and Aktsiaselts Tallinna Vesi v. Republic of Estonia

In 2001, at the request of Estonia, United Utilities (Tallinn) BV made an investment in AS Tallinna Vesi by purchasing 50.4% of the shares in the Company. This was a part of Estonia’s privatisation of AS Tallinna Vesi. The privatisation was sponsored and closely supervised by the European Bank for Reconstruction and Development (EBRD). Since […]